SharecloseShare pageCopy linkAbout sharingMore than 2,500 women who were victims of the PIP breast implant scandal should receive compensation, a French appeal court has decided.It also upheld an earlier judgement finding German company TUV Rheinland, which awarded safety certificates for the faulty implants, negligent. The case in Paris involved 540 British women, who say they suffered long-term health effects.The results could have far-reaching implications for other victims. PIP breast implant scandal: Victims visited by bailiffsPIP breast implants: ‘serious lessons must be learned’Jan Spivey, one of the women in the case, was given PIP implants after she had a mastectomy due to breast cancer. After hearing the decision, she said she felt “elated and exhausted”.”It’s been a very long journey,” she said.”We’ve been in and out of court, and that’s been really difficult for women. We’ve got health issues and we’ve got lots of other responsibilities too – PIP has had an impact on the whole of our lives.”It’s been an inescapable issue.”Jan developed aching joints, pain and fatigue after having the implants, and once they were removed it was clear they had been leaking silicone into her body.”My PIP implants from 20 years ago are still impacting on my life and my health and my wellbeing, even today,” Jan said.”I think I’ve been angry every single day for the 20 years I’ve been affected by PIP.”Another woman affected by the case, Nicola Mason – who had breast implants which then ruptured – said the court decision was “a victory, it’s amazing”.”We’ve waited a long time for this,” she told the Today programme on BBC Radio 4.Nicola first found out about the rupture when she was pregnant, after noticing a large lump under her arm. She said it was “quite traumatic and there was absolutely nothing I could do”.Eventually, the implants were removed but she says she has been left with a massive lump of silicone under her arm which still flares up.”I don’t think anyone knows the long-term effects,” she says.Cheap siliconeBetween 2001 and 2010 the substandard implants were manufactured by the French company Poly Implant Prothèse or PIP.It was liquidated in 2010 and its founder was later given a prison sentence after it emerged the implants were filled with cheap, industrial-grade silicone which was not cleared for human use. It is estimated up to 400,000 women worldwide have received the illegal implants. Latin America was worst hit, in particular Colombia, where there are estimated to be 60,000 victims. In the UK it is thought 47,000 women are affected.Olivier Aumaître, the lawyer representing Jan Spivey and around 2,700 others in the current case, is hoping that after a 10-year legal battle, Thursday will be an important moment.”We will probably reach a turning point. A positive decision will probably put an end to the long period of doubt we’ve been going through during so many years. And the weight of compensation will be widely open for victims.” The case, known as TUV1, was the first to be brought, a decade ago, against TUV Rheinland which issued European safety certificates for the PIP implants.The Appeal Court in Paris will decide whether the German company was negligent and if so whether the women should receive compensation.The ruling is expected to have wider implications for almost 20,000 other women, half of whom are British, who are taking similar legal action in France.Alifie Jones is at home with her son where she has been recovering after having her faulty PIP breast implants removed – just last month. She was finally convinced by a friend to take them out after suffering years of extreme exhaustion and debilitating pain.She says the worst thing about it was wondering why she felt so ill all the time: “Not knowing what it was, the mysterious illnesses, not being able to exercise. Not being vibrant, having my life, sort of stolen from me in a way.” The surgeon was shocked by what he found when he removed one of the implants. It had broken into multiple pieces inside her – exposing her body to an industrial-grade silicone gel.”I can’t believe they were allowed to be implanted in me. I don’t know how they got through regulations, don’t know how they got in me. “But I feel guilty that I messed about with my body and I put them in in the first place. But I’m angry that a human being can do that to another human being.”TUV Rheinland dispute the liability but declined to comment.Did you receive a PIP implant? Share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also get in touch in the following ways:WhatsApp: +44 7756 165803Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSayUpload pictures or videoPlease read our terms & conditions and privacy policy

If you are reading this page and can’t see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your question or comment or you can email us at HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk. Please include your name, age and location with any submission.